![]() ![]() Right now, we are not investing anywhere near at the level needed to take carbon removal techniques to scale. So what is preventing us from scaling up carbon removal? ![]() The reality is however that we do not have time to delay either making progress on emissions abatement or scaling new carbon removal technologies and techniques. Make no mistake the transition to a low carbon economy is one of the biggest challenges humanity has ever faced. Investing in carbon removal strategies is also sometimes criticized by those who argue that the current priority should be on the monumental task of decarbonizing the economy. Because of this, CCS is often, and arguably quite rightly, criticized for being a form of greenwashing used by the fossil fuel industry as a means to continue business as usual without having to make significant cuts to their emissions. ![]() In contrast, CCS usually refers to methods for capturing carbon emissions produced by industrial processes or power plants, particularly coal-fired ones, and storing them to avoid releasing them into the atmosphere. Remember that the goal of carbon removal techniques is to remove carbon from the atmosphere and reduce the overall concentration of carbon in the atmosphere. Part of the controversy surrounding carbon removal arises in part from its frequent confusion with carbon capture and storage (CCS). This all makes sense, but isn’t carbon removal controversial? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |